Editor - Oliver Lomas is missing the point.1 The need for medical schools to produce well rounded and socially aware doctors, although having some political basis, is real. Firstly, because this is what the public wants and deserves, and, secondly, because of the professions own longstanding recognition that medicine encompasses not only science but elements of art too, an area that has traditionally been neglected to the detriment of the profession.
A thorough understanding of the medical sciences is, of course, fundamental to future clinical practice, but unless you can discover what motivates a patient to present, recognise why they behave a certain way, and relate to them, then you cannot practise effectively.
Although some teaching methods are contrived, social awareness and communication skills do not lend themselves solely to self directed learning, but neither can they be taught rote style. Medical schools are trying to introduce concepts on which the student can build. Relying on students to work in their own time is not a viable option; there are only so many who could and realistically only so many who would.
Progress is not being made at the expense of medical knowledge; progress is being made to expand knowledge. Although current methods may not always get it quite right, view them in the manner in which they are intended: rather than cheapening medical education, they are a genuine attempt to enrich it.