
U-turn on blood policy
Jehovah's Witnesses are now allowed to accept blood transfusions without facing excommunication from their faith.
Following a secret meeting of
the following's 12 member global
governing body at their New York
headquarters, a change in practice was decreed and blood transfusion was officially downgraded
to a "non-disfellowshipping
event." Jehovah's Witnesses may
now consent to and accept blood
transfusions in life or death situations without facing expulsion
from the movement. This is the
biggest stepdown in policy made
at the Watchtower (the collective
name of the movement's headquarters) since their predicted
Armageddon failed to occur in
1975. It is, however, being dismissed as a "slight adjustment" to
the rules by senior representatives of the organisation.

Jehovah's Witnesses may now accept blood transfusions in emergencies (JANE HWANG/AP PHOTO)
|
Until now, anyone who
accepted blood or consented to
transfusion for their child, even
under life or death conditions,
faced excommunication from
the religion. In what is seen as a
dramatic turnaround, elders
announced the decision in the
wake of some high profile cases
where patients have died or
come close to death as a result
of their faith. One such case was
that of Brent Bond from Nottingham in June this year. Mr
Bond was the victim of a
machete attack and lost 2.8 litres
of blood from his wounds. He
renounced his faith as a Jehovah's Witness seconds before
passing out so that he could
have a lifesaving blood transfusion. Beverley Matthews, a 33
year old mother from Stockport,
died following her refusal of an
emergency blood transfusion.
Paul Gillies, speaking for the
British Jehovah's Witnesses
headquarters in Mill Hill, north
London, said, "It is quite possible
that someone who was under
pressure on an operating table
would take a blood transfusion
because they did not want to die.
The next day they might say they
regretted this decision. We would
then give them spiritual comfort
and help. No action would be
taken against them. We would
just view it as a moment of weakness." He stated that the principle of not taking blood was still a
"core value" of the religion.
Navin Chohan London

|