
Celebrity illnesses raise awareness but can give wrong message
When a celebrity develops a
disease, public awareness of the
disorder usually increases dramatically, a US seminar heard
last week. But the campaigns
that spring up in the wake of the
publicity sometimes mislead the
public about what can or should
be done to prevent it.

Betty Ford (AP PHOTO/ BOB DAUGHERTY) |
The first celebrity to speak
out was Betty Ford, wife of president Gerald Ford, who did a
great deal to raise awareness of
breast cancer in 1974, Dr Barron
Lerner of Columbia University
told the meeting. Detection rates
rose immediately in a phenomenon that became known as the
"Betty Ford blip."
But her daughter now advocates that every woman should
have mammography from the
age of 35 onwards, a strategy not
supported by most cancer
experts.
The seminar, sponsored by
the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism in New
York, was moderated by Dr
George Lundberg, editor in
chief of Medscape.com and former editor of JAMA. He said
that when celebrities were open
about their illnesses, it often
educated the public.
American celebrities have
gone public about breast
cancer, prostate cancer, colon
cancer, diabetes, AIDS, and
Parkinson's disease. When Nancy
Reagan, wife of President Reagan, had a mastectomy, lumpectomy rates fell for six months,
probably because women felt that
the president's wife got the best
medical advice.

Nancy Reagan (AP PHOTO/ DENNIS PAQUIN PRNEWSFOTO/ SURVIVALINK) |
Prostate cancer hit the headlines when New York's mayor
Rudolph Giuliani dropped out
of a Senate race against Hillary
Clinton when he was diagnosed.
Former presidential candidate
Bob Dole and sports, military,
and entertainment figures have
also discussed their prostate cancers. They tell men to get tested.
The message is even on a postage stamp.

Rudolph Giuliani (AP PHOTO/ STEPHEN CHERNIN) |
The American Cancer Society, however, does not recommend screening for every man. It
suggests that men be given information so that they can decide
for themselves about screening
for prostate cancer, said Dr
Robert Smith of the American
Cancer Society.
Brief celebrity messages cannot explain the downside of
screening, such as false positive
results, more tests, costs, and
anxiety, said Dr David Atkins of
the US Agency for Health Care
Research and Quality. "There is
no free lunch," he added.
Whereas Americans are individualistic and want screening
for themselves, European governments providing universal
health care must seek the best
approach for the entire population, and within budget.
Increasing public awareness
of common diseases is good, but
few celebrities publicise the most
obvious messages on disease
prevention. For example, no
celebrity is yet talking about his
or her high cholesterol and
heart disease, drunken driving,
or injury from not wearing seat
belts.
The seminar can be accessed at www.jrn.columbia.edu/healthpolicy/
Janice Hopkins Tanne New York

|