skip navigation
student.bmj.com

Computer based learning is more effective than lectures


Students may be learning more from using their computers than from attending lectures, according to a study published in July.

Research psychiatrists at the School of Medicine, University of Leeds, compared students' use of a computer based multimedia package with lecture based teaching on the subject of anxiety. They found that even though students felt they learned more in the lecture theatre, they gained more from using a computer package.


(MARK TUSCHMAN/THE STOCK MARKET)

Dr Chris Williams and his colleagues at the Academic Unit of Psychiatry and Behavioural Science carried out the research. All 197 medical students in the fourth year at Leeds Medical School, undertaking their psychiatry attachment for the first time in the academic year 1998-99, were included in the study. The students were randomly allocated to either lecture or computer based teaching. The same video material on the subject of anxiety was included in the lecture and the computer package, and both sessions lasted 55 minutes.

Dr Williams presented his findings to The Royal College of Psychiatrists' Annual Meeting 2000, held at the Edinburgh International Conference Centre in July. He told the meeting: "The students rated the computer package as being easy to use in libraries and as a teaching resource, but in general they felt attending a lecture led to greater increase in knowledge."

The students answered questionnaires before and after the lecture or computer session on their ability to assess, diagnose, and manage anxiety. The researchers found a difference between objective and subjective ratings in the questionnaires - in other words, the students felt they learned more from the lecture but had actually gained more from the package. Dr Williams said: "The study suggests that sometimes students don't know what is good for them and may lead to cessation of innovative teaching approaches that might otherwise have led to gains in knowledge and skills."

Kay Brennan, Leeds


studentBMJ 2000;08:259-302 August ISSN 0966-6494



Previous article    Return to top    Next article
Printer friendly page    Download article PDF    Email this article to a friend