Foot and mouth disease: the human consequences

The health consequences are slight, the economic ones huge

The current major outbreak of foot and mouth disease (FMD) is the latest in a series of disasters that are putting British agriculture under stress.¹ The disease affects all cloven.hoofed ani. mals and is the most contagious of animal diseases. It is caused by a virus of the family Picornaviridae, genus Aphthovirus, of which there are seven serotypes (O, A, C, SAT1, SAT2, SAT3, and Asia1). The current outbreak in the United Kingdom is due to the highly virulent pan.Asiatic serotype O.¹ In animals the disease presents with acute fever, followed by the development of blisters chiefly in the mouth and on the feet. Infected animals secrete numerous virus particles before clinical signs appear.²

Foot and mouth disease is a zoonosis, a disease transmissible to humans, but it crosses the species bar. rier with difficulty and with little effect. Given the high incidence of the disease in animals, both in the past and in more recent outbreaks worldwide, its occurrence in man is rare³ so experience of the human infection is limited. The last human case reported in Britain occurred in 1966, during the last epidemic of foot and mouth disease.⁴ The circumstances in which it does occur in humans are not well defined, though all reported cases have had close contact with infected animals. There is one report from 1834 of three veterinarians acquiring the disease from deliberately drinking raw milk from infected cows.⁵ There is no report of infection from pasteurised milk, and the Food Standards Agency considers that foot and mouth disease has no implications for the human food chain.

The type of virus most often isolated in humans is type O followed by type C and rarely A. The incubation period in humans is 2.6 days. Symptoms have mostly been mild and self limiting, mainly uncomfortable tingling blisters on the hands but also fever, sore throat, and blisters on the feet and in the mouth, including the tongue.³ Patients have usually recovered a week after the last blister formation. In the unlikely event of human cases in the current outbreak in Britain they should be reported to the Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre (0208 200 6868) duty doctor, who can direct professional inquiries towards expert advice on management and diagnosis.² Suspected and confirmed human cases must have no contact with susceptible livestock to avoid transmitting the disease. Person to person spread has not been reported.

Foot and mouth disease should not be confused with the human disease hand, foot, and mouth disease. This is an unrelated and usually mild viral infection, principally of children, caused by different viruses, principally coxsackie A virus.⁶

Foot and mouth disease is endemic in many countries, including much of Africa, Asia, and South America, where its importance relates to the reduced productivity of livestock, the cost of vaccination, and the restrictions placed on international trade in live animals and animal products.⁷ To be listed among the "FMD free countries where vaccination is not practised" the Office International des Epizooties, the international regulatory body concerned with animal infections,⁸ requires a country to have a record of regular and prompt animal disease reporting and to supply documented evidence of an effective system of surveillance. Such a country should also not import animals vaccinated against foot and mouth disease⁹ since serological testing cannot differentiate between infected and vaccinated animals. A "foot and mouth free zone" may be established in a country in which parts are infected, separated from the rest by a buffer zone.

As international trade barriers become increasingly subject to scrutiny, foot and mouth disease remains one of the few remaining constraints to international trade in live animals and animal products. The occurrence of even a single case of foot and mouth disease in a previously disease free country results in an immediate ban on an economically valuable export trade. The European Commission in 1990.1, after undertaking a cost benefit analysis, implemented a policy of non.vaccination to increase export opportunities and to ensure high animal health standards.¹⁰ This outbreak containment policy requires an export ban on all livestock and animal products from any affected country, along with movement restrictions and the slaughter and burning of all cloven-hoofed animals that are either infected, on infected premises, or in contact with infected animals. Until now the European Union has remained free of foot and mouth disease since an outbreak in Greece in 1996.

The highest risk to European Union countries is through legal and illegal imports of infected live animals and contaminated meat or dairy products from infected countries then being eaten by animals. International travellers bringing back food from endemic countries could spread the disease. The foot and mouth disease virus can survive for long periods in a range of fresh, partially cooked, cured, and smoked meats and in inadequately pasteurised dairy products. Currently animals and animal products need to be checked only when they enter the European Union. Once inside, and with correct documentation, they can be moved around without restriction. For these reasons other countries have banned the import of animal products from the UK.

Spread of the virus is facilitated by the development of long distance animal trading. Dense livestock populations may also enhance local spread in the vicinity of an outbreak. Awareness of the disease among livestock owners is crucial, as are the UK's excellent diagnostic facilities. Spread can take place on the wind and mechanically by the movement of animals, people, and vehicles that have been contaminated with the virus. Thus the whole British population has a role in combating the disease. Restriction of non-essential movement both into and out of affected farms and more widely in the country. side is important. This is requiring close collaboration between veterinary, health, and local authorities. If these measures are not successful, however, the major review of safeguards announced by the agriculture minister may lead to major changes in animal husbandry in the UK.¹¹

Henry Prempeh, specialist registrar public health medicine

Robert Smith, clinical scientist (zoonoses)
Email: robert.smith@cdsc.wales.nhs.uk

Berit Müller, epidemiologist, PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London NW9 5EQ


studentBMJ 2001;09:85-128 April ISSN 0966-6494

1. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food. Foot and mouth disease - FAQ [online]. London: MAFF, 2001. www.maff.gov.uk/animalh/diseases/fmd/qa1.htm. (Accessed 05 March 2001). This site is being regularly updated during this outbreak.
2. Foot and mouth disease outbreak. no threat to public health. Commun Dis Rep CDR Wkly 2001;11:1.2.
3. Bauer K. Foot.and.mouth disease as zoonosis. Arch Virol 1997;13 (suppl):95.7.
4. Armstrong R, Davie J, Hedger RS. Foot.and.mouth disease in man. BMJ 1967;4:529.30.
5. Hertwig CA. ?bertragung tierischer Ansteckungsstoffe auf den Men. schen. Med Vet Z 1834;48.
6. Chin J, ed. Coxsackievirus diseases. In: Control of communicable diseases manual. 17th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 2000:129.31.
7. Donaldson AI, Doel TR. Foot.and.mouth disease: the risk for Great Britain after 1992. Vet Record 1992; 8 Aug;131:114.20.
8. Kitching RP. Foot and mouth disease: current world situation. Vaccine 1999; 17:1772.4.
9. Recommendations applicable to specific diseases: Foot and mouth disease International Animal Health Code - 2000. Paris: Office International des Epizooties, 2000.
10. Report from the Commission to the Council on a study carried out by the Commission on policies currently applied by Member States in the control of foot.and.mouth disease. Brussels: CEC, 1989.
11. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food. Foot and mouth disease: thorough review of measures to reduce disease risk [online]. 2001; 3 Mar. http://www.maff.gov.uk/inf/newsrel/2001/010303a.htm