Intuition and the ill infant
Nowhere in medicine is the use of
observation, instinct, and innate
experience more important than
in attempting to make a clinical diagnosis
in an acutely ill infant. I like to refer to this
as veterinary paediatrics, as sick animals
and sick children share many attributes
they refuse to eat; they lie down when they
are sick; their language and communication skills are limited; they depend on
others to sort out their problems; and
when ill they prefer to be left alone.

Figure 1 Sir Luke Fildes “The doctor” shows the doctor carefully observing an ill child
Sir William Osler said, There is no
more difficult art to acquire than the art
of observation. This is well captured in
the illustration of the sick child, a painting which used to hang on the wall of
many doctors’ surgeries (fig 1). It shows
the doctor carefully observing an ill child
placed across the chairs in a poor household. His posture is pensive, his look
inquiring, but the child’s position and that
of the parents tell the viewer that the
child is critically ill.
I like to quote to my students the saying
of Auguste Bier (1861-1949): "A smart
mother makes often a better diagnosis
than a poor doctor." In reality, of course,
any mother is likely to make a better diagnosis than a "poor" doctor. About 70 to
80% of paediatric diagnoses are basedlargely on history. It is essential that students ask the mother what her worries are.
Figure 2 displays the fundamental problem the child or young infant being limited in his or her clinical vocabulary and
yet needing to communicate to the mother or the attending doctor. Fortunately,
most mothers are excellent barometers of
their children’s wellbeing and are good
communicators of their problems if doctors are attuned to listen.
It is important to look carefully
Look at the infant in figure 3. Is the infant
sick or well? What can you learn simply
by looking? You can see a well fed, pale,
sleeping infant in the mother’s lap.
Bellini’s portrayal of the infant Jesus shows
eyes that are a little sunken. It is difficult to
comment on hydration, and there is no
rash. Such signs in your own patient might
suggest that the infant is anaemic, perhaps
dehydrated but well nourished, and needs
further assessment.
An example of a typical ill child is
shown in figure 4 painted by Henry Jules
Jean. It shows the greyness or muddiness
which is typical if the ill child.
My approach code to the acutely ill
child is:
- Stop
- Listen (especially to the mother) but
also to the child’s cough, breathing or
other noises such as cry, croupy croak
or laboured wheeze
- Look, look, look, look
- Examine the child with your eyes. This
can be done equally well in the sleeping
or awake child. A no touch technique is
my first approach to the ill child. You
can comment on nutrition, hydration,
respiration, haemoglobination,
circulation, with a modicum of accuracy
without laying a finger on the child
- Then use your other senses. Touch
forehead. Touch the toes. Is there a
temperature difference? Touch the
chest. A temperature gradient from
centre to periphery is instructive,
suggesting peripheral vasoconstriction.
Feel the pulses, noting pulse volume.
Listen again for the cough, cry, wheeze,
or grunt, all of which may be alerting.
Smell is not usually very useful to me,
but my colleagues tell me they can
detect acetone, urea, or other smells of
sickness.
An observation unit is beneficial
We have in our children’s hospital anobservation ward in the accident and
emergency department. Here our students
and residents can allow children to be
observed for several hours while attempting to make a decision about whether the
child needs to be admitted or can be safely sent home. It is undeniably the most
important ward in the hospital. The usefulness of a short stay observation unit in
a hospital emergency department has
been recently attested by a group from
Bordeaux. 1
The history should give important clues.
Observation will add some further cues or
pointers towards where we should look
next. Is this an acute infection? Is the child
septic? Could he or she have a major
metabolic crisis? Is there any suggestion
of neurological insult?
The questions for any doctor attending
an acutely ill infant are:
(1) How do I detect the early signs of
serious impending illness?
(2) How do I decide who, what, when
to refer to hospital?
(3) How do I ensure not to miss acute
severe illness?
It is little short of disastrous for any doctor to see a child one day and to learn
the next day that the infant died of a sudden unexpected infant death or of an
overwhelming septicaemia in the subsequent 24 hours. Undoubtedly when this
occurs many such infants will have had
few or no alerting symptoms or signs.
However, allowing ourselves more time
to look, listen, and accumulate information can only improve our diagnostic
acumen. A good instinct, innate suspicion, and deliberation will serve us all
well. Boxes 1 and 2 list some of the
mechanisms by which acute illness is signalled. A recent paper has proposed the
ILL criteria for recognising significant
bacterial sepsis in infants ILL being an
anagram for irritability, lethargy, low capillary refill. 2

Figure 2 The fundamental difficulty is limited communication between baby and mother/doctor
Box 1: Always serious symptoms or
signs in infancy
- High pitched screaming or crying
(suggests pain)
- Alternating drowsiness and/or
irritability (neurological?)
- Convulsion
- Refusal to feed (two or more feeds)
v
- Repeated vomiting
- Rapid laboured breathing with or
without grunting (pneumonia?)
- Episodes of unusual blueness or
paleness
- Presence of purpuric rash
(septicaemia?)
Box 2: Usually serious symptoms in
infancy
- Prolonged crying
- Persistent crankiness
- Worsening croup
- Wanting to be left alone (apathy)
Box 3: Key points
- Learn and see
- Linger and listen
- Discuss and deduce
- Prime your senses
Experience and instinct will help
There are many rapid assessment schemes
in paediatrics which attempt to give a
score for the doctor to decide the degree
of sickness. The Baby Check Score System
was proposed by a Cambridge group in
1991. 3-5 It consisted of 19 checks (seven
symptom questions and 12 examination
signs) each carrying a score. The higher
the total score, the sicker the baby. It was
evaluated in hospital, general practice, and
by mothers. The authors concluded that
the Baby Check Score should improve the
detection of serious illness in infants and
reduce the number admitted with minor
illness. Others subscribe to subjective sickness scores, whereby you attempt to decide
if a child is critically ill, seriously ill, mod-erately ill, or not too ill. Experience and
instinct will make a major input to this
decision.
Here are some vitals from a 10 week
old infant who arrived at our hospital on
a recent Friday morning. Pulse: 210 beats a
minute; central temperature: 40 degres C; toe
temperature: 30 degrees C; systolic blood pressure:
40 mmHg; capillary refill time: 8 seconds;
respiratory rate: 70 a minute.
Clearly this infant is critically ill and
requires immediate resuscitation with
diagnosis taking secondary importance.The critically ill infant has mottled skin,
a muddy or grey appearance, is centrally warm and peripherally cold, and usually lies quiet and immobile. I like the
description of the ill child written in
1850 by Maunsell: "The child when ill is
more or less peevish" dislikes being
stirred or even cries when being handled; its hour of sleep is uncertain and
rests ill or wakes startled and crying."
This is a very nice description of alternating drowsiness and irritability"perhaps sepsis, perhaps meningitis.
Scientifically this infant is shocked, shut
down, and desaturated. Clinically still
and silent, cold and cyanosed. The
observations listed in table 1 may be
alerting.
It can be surprisingly difficult to reach
a rapid clinical diagnosis in an acutely ill
infant. Intussusception, for example, may
present as a pale, shocked, irritable
infant. Galactosaemia may manifest as
an apparent septic shock. Peritonitis or
appendicitis are notoriously difficult
diagnoses in infancy. Shaken baby
syndrome may present with a convulsion
or with respiratory difficulty. Table 2 lists
some of the acute emergencies in infancy, all requiring rapid diagnosis and
management.



Figure 3 Detail from “Madonna in the meadow” by Giovanni Bellini shows a sleeping baby Jesus THE NATIONAL GALLERY, LONDON
Conclusion
Students should sit in the resuscitation
room and observe events, especially ill
infants. Stand beside intensive care unit
incubators and look at sick infants. Linger
in the observation ward looking and listening. Many centuries ago Leonardo Da
Vinci advised "learn to see." Do so.
Looking at infants breathing is by far themost instructive skill in assessing respiratory or cardiac problems. Rapid laboured
breathing with grunting is almost synony-mous with pneumonia or cardiac failure.
Ultimately, the good clinician is the
good diagnostician. Intuition means
immediate apprehension by the mind
without reasoning. Immediate insight and
instinct may instil innate impulsion. I’ve
got a good nose for trouble, is how one
general practitioner friend sums up this
attribute. More likely he possesses good
eyes and sharp wits.

Figure 4 Henry Jules Jean’s "Visiting day at the hospital" shows the greyness typical of an ill child
THE BRIDGEMAN ART LIBRARY
Denis Gill, professor of paediatrics, Children’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
studentBMJ 2001;09:85-128 April ISSN 0966-6494
- Lamireau T, Llanas B, Fayon M. A short stay observation unit improves care in the paediatric emergency care
setting. Arch Dis Child 2000;83:271.
- Brogan PA, Raffles A. The management of fever and
petechiae: making sense of rash decisions. Arch Dis Child
2000;83:506-7.
- Thornton AJ, Morley CJ, Cole TJ, Green SJ, Walker KA,
Rennie JM. Field trials of the Baby Check Score card in
hsopital. Arch Dis Child 1991; 66:115-20.
- Morley CJ, Thornton AJ, Green SJ, Cole TJ. Field trials
of the Baby Check Score in general practice. Arch Dis
Child 1991;66:111-4.
- Thornton AJ, Morley CJ, Green SJ, Cole TJ, Walker KA,
Bonnett JM. Field trials of the Baby Check Score card:
mothers scoring their babies at home. Arch Dis Child 1991;66:106-10.