Körperwelten: the fascination of authenticity
As
the now notorious Professor Gunther von Hagenss controversial
Body Worlds exhibition finally reaches London, Dora
Vertes remains outraged after seeing it in Brussels
...
he
human body is the most fascinating machine I have ever seen. I am now
finishing my third year of medical school, and I chose to study
medicine so that I might understand the body better.
I have studied the anatomy of the human body and done
dissection: I learnt to respect death. I have met patients, listened to
their problems, and tried to understand them: I have learnt to respect
life.

Gunther von Hagens thinks that
everyone has to learn about the body. He uncovers it to let people see
whats insidethe machine, without soul. He invented a
technique called plastinationthe fixation of an organic object,
in this case the human bodywhich prevents putrefaction. After
dissection, the body is dehydrated and then impregnated with a resin
that polymerises and hardens in the
tissues.
The technique itself is
interesting: the dissected part of the body is hard, dry, doesnt
smell or degrade, is easy to manipulate, and keeps for a long time. As
a teaching material, it would have been a fantastic aid for healthcare
professionals.
But von Hagens
didnt develop the technique for medical students or doctors. No,
after thousands of hours of work, dissection, and plastination, he put
up a public exhibition. An exhibition in which bodies are presented in
artistic poses that remind you of sculptures or
paintings.
When the exhibition came
to Brussels, he was invited to come and take part in a debate with
students at my medical school. We wanted to know if he meant to create
art (which would be disapproved of), or if he wanted to show the human
body to all. We also wondered where the bodies came
from.
He did come and speak, but he
didnt give any answers. He tried to elude our questions and was
upset that no one from television was there: only radio journalists
were let in.
A number of us went
together to see the exhibition in the cellars of a slaughterhouse in
Brussels, which seemed an inappropriate setting. The bodies were
beautifully dissected, and seeing the technique of plastination was
astounding.
But the rest was horror
disguised: they had no skin, no face, and looked too beautiful to be
frightening. The artistic poses were shocking. The woman who was eight
months pregnant was too much for many of us. There were children
running around; everybody obviously interested, excited. Had they
realised that they were looking at people who once lived, loved, and
died?
As future doctors, we are told
every day that patients are people and not just cases and bodies. At
this exhibition we seemed to be the only viewers to think this. But at
least, we could find answers to some of our questions. We all got the
impression that von Hagens actually meant to show artistic poses to
attract people, to appeal to human curiosity. Horror can be strangely
attractive.
If von Hagens had meant
the exhibition to be educational, as he claimed, then why did he put
the bodies in these shocking, artificial poses? His main goal seemed
clear to us: money. The entrance fee was 10 (£6.15;
$8.75).
At the exit was one last shock: you could write your
name on a list declaring that you agree to plastination of your body
after death. Von Hagens did not promise that you would be chosen, but
if youre young enough and are in good shape you have every
chance. This disgusts me. How can a doctor, in the name of education,
overwrite something as important to our society as the death
ritual?
How can von Hagens expose
bodies of real people, for everyone to see or touch, without any
respect? We learn, during our studies, to respect the human body; a
respect anyone would find natural, even necessary, when lying in bed in
a hospital, or standing next to a loved one who had just
died.
A grave mistake has been made,
a limit has been crossed. The body should be considered as a whole: a
beautiful machine but also the home for the soul. I think we need this
limit to orient our lives.
The
exhibition started in London on 23 March 2002. I recommend that every
medical student goes to see it. Otherwise how can you believe that this
disguised horror which no one seems to notice is true? So much for the
fascination of
authenticity.
Dora Vertes, third year medical student, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
Email: d.vertes@student.md.ucl.ac.be
Body
Worlds was reviewed in studentBMJ 2001;9:437 (November
2001) when it was showing in Brussels. It is now showing at the
Atlantis Gallery, Old Truman Brewery, 146 Brick Lane, London E1 6QL, 9
am to 9 pm until 29 September 2002; www.bodyworlds.com; tel +44
(0)20 7053 0000; email
exhibition@plastination.com
studentBMJ 2002;10:131-170 May ISSN 0966-6494
|
REVIEWS
Körperwelten: the fascination of authenticity
(Dora Vertes - May 2002)
|
|
Caity (September 20th, 2007)
Student, Artist, studying fine artshaa_haa5@hotmail.com
|
|
|
While i agree with some of the points you brought up about Hagens' work, the body should be seen as an art form. The bodies used were donated by the individuals at their own will. While you may see this as morally wrong, others see it as fascinating. You yourself are looking at it from a medical point of view, but from an artists view, this work is to be admired.
|
|
|