Length of time it takes to treat patient with lung cancer may be fatal
Editor - It
is estimated that most patients who have the symptoms of lung cancer do
not present to their local general practitioner or emergency department
until 12-24 weeks after the onset of their symptoms. If lung
cancer is suspected, referral to a chest physician takes about two
weeks. If special tests are needed, a chest radiograph and spirometry
will be carried out, followed by bronchoscopy and biopsy to confirm the
diagnosis of lung cancer. It then takes six weeks in a typical NHS
trust to attain the results of the biopsy. If computed tomography is
required, the patient may have to wait for another six weeks. Once the
scan has been done, the patients management will be discussed in
a
meeting.
The three main options for a patient with lung cancer
depend on their fitness for surgery, which is assessed by using the
World Health Organizations criteria for grading patient
performance status, and on the TNM staging for the
tumour.
These are the options for
management:
(1)Palliative
carepatient is not fit for surgery owing to extensive spread of
tumour and
metastases
(2)Patient
is fit for surgerytumour is resectable, surgery may be
curative
(3)Patient
is not viable for surgery at the momentradio/chemotherapy is
an option, with a view to future surgery if there is improvement and
reduction in tumour
size.
Approximately
one in 10 patients are potential candidates for surgery. But the
waiting time for surgery can be anything up to 10 weeks. These are
patients whose life expectancy can increase if they have an operation
as soon as possible. So why is there only one hospital in the region
with a unit for thoracic
surgery?
Patients who need
chemotherapy first can still potentially benefit if they are seen
quickly. But again the waiting times are almost 10
weeks.
The average life expectancy
of a patient with small cell lung cancer at the time of presentation is
12-15 weeks. Yet, the average journey time for a
lung cancer patient is approximately 24 weeks. Why is
this?
One explanation is that NHS
resources are very strained. But maybe it is not the amount of money
being put into the NHS but the way money is
distributed.
As tomorrows
doctors we must be aware of the time it takes for a patient to receive
treatment for any conditionit may well be the difference between
life and death. The management of the patient continues after the
initial referral, and government statistics seem to neglect this
fact.
Israar Ul-Haq, fourth year medical student, University of Birmingham
Email: iceman786786@hotmail.com
studentBMJ 2002;10:303-352 September ISSN 0966-6494