Blood and Justice
Pete Moore
John Wiley, 2002,
Hardcover, £16.00, pp 248
ISBN
0 470 84842
1
Rating:
**
Millions
of blood donations are collected every year and are used in nearly
every specialty of medicine to save countless lives. It is taken for
granted that blood will be there for us to use when we need itas
a doctor treating a patient, or as a patient in need ourselves. It has
taken several centuries of research and discovery for blood transfusion
to function as effectively as it does
today.
Pete Moores Blood
and Justice delves into 17th century Europe, a period of
innovation. Leading scientists of the day are battling to make
historyby transfusing a lambs blood into a human being.
Blood was seen as magical and sacred in the 1600s, no one knew where is
came from or what it was for. The favoured treatment was to bleed it
out of patients, whatever their symptoms. William Harvey was
essentially ignored in 1620 when he showed that blood circulates around
the body, so the controversial medics who decided to investigate the
merits of feeding blood back into the body were viewed with much
scepticism.
The book follows the
progress of French pioneer Jean-Baptise Denis, who earned his
place in history for successfully performing the first blood
transfusion on a humanbut ended up on trial for murder as his
early experiments went horribly
wrong.
The story reminded me of how
much has been achieved in medicine over the past 400 years,
scientifically, clinically and ethically. In Deniss time,
treatment was based on myth and experimentation and doctors were
renowned for doing more harm than good. Psychiatric patients were
freely used as guinea pigstied down without consent and
subjected to life threatening experiments. Doctors of the day stuck
together, showing a reluctance to accept ideas and research that
deviated from the traditionally held understanding. Much has changed
since then, but Moore makes a valid point in comparing the 17th century
blood transfusion debate with todays discussions surrounding
stem cells and cloning.
The
laborious procedure of discovery is illustrated in Blood and
Justice using plenty of original sources and historical detail,
which although interesting become slightly repetitive towards the end
of the book. The history behind transfusion is worth knowing, and after
reading about it through the eyes of a 17th century clinician, I will
definitely think next time Im munching on my post blood donation biscuit.
Ellen Welch, intercalating medical student, London
Email: welchellen@yahoo.co.uk
studentBMJ 2003;11:219-262 July ISSN 0966-6494