Ethics in medicine
Is
modern medicine, preoccupied with disease and treatment, undermining
ethical concerns? Are our priorities misplaced? Are we leaning towards
fame and fortune, rather than basic human
disposition?
I set off for the
ethical guided tour with the American Medical Association's
virtual mentor
(www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/3040.html).
The site familiarises young doctors with the law, humanities, and
bioethics. Each month, the site deals with a "hot area" in
medical ethics from all possible perspectives. For instance, the August
2003 issue was dedicated to problems in paediatrics. Cases are
presented-one described how a specialist treated a sick child in
spite of parental opposition steeped in religious dogma-and then
different experts comment. A presentation shows how doctors should make
decisions when parents and children are scared of a particular
treatment. In Case in Health Law, you get to know about the legal
footholds. The archive stores plenty of such complicated ethical
dilemmas-ranging from end of life care to maternal-fetal
conflict.
Run by University of
Washington School of Medicine,http://eduserv.hscer.washington.edu/bioethics/toc.html
is a comprehensive site offering glimpses of biomedical
ethics in a clinical context. Bioethics Tool is a sort of primer, based
on views from moral philosophers, aimed at familiarising doctors with
the art of balancing "benefiting" with "avoiding
harming" patients in critical cases. Bioethics Topics contains
discussions about specific areas of conflict, which usually place
doctors in acute dilemmas. For instance, Breaking Bad News will help
you manoeuvre through emotional outbursts of patients and relatives if
you have given a fatal prognosis. The Mistakes section will train you
to confess your errors effectively without inviting patient ire.
Physician-Patient Relationship gives priceless tips to win
patients' trust. The site includes good links at the
end.
The online journal BMC
Medical Ethics (www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmedethics) showcases
original research articles on the ethics of medicine in real
situations, faced by doctors in different parts of the world. The
debate section informs about futuristic issues-human cloning
laws, DNA databanks-along with tricky things like the sedation of
dying patients in intensive care. The archive will familiarise you with
unforeseen problems and is backed up with in-depth
analyses.
Aggressive marketing from
pharmaceutical companies influences doctors' prescribing all over
the world. To counter such unethical practice and to promote evidence
based health care, www.nofreelunch.org was launched in 1999. The site
opens with a questionnaire to make you aware how our profession is
slowly becoming dependent on drug companies. Facts and Fallacies offers
you links to data and research about this unfortunate trend. The
website helps you to stand up for your professional ethics and
confidently refuse gifts from drug companies. A section for medical
students explains how to organise activities and run pledge drives
against unfair drug
promotion.
Susmita Barman third year medical student Calcutta Medical College, India
Email: susmitabarman@rediffmail.com
studentBMJ 2004;12:45-88 February ISSN 0966-6494