Bullet Boy
Directed
by Saul Dibb
UK release
date: 8 April
2005
www.bulletboy.net
Rating:
****
Bullet
Boy tells the story of Ricky, a young black male, struggling to escape
his criminal past, peer group, and most importantly his sense of
absolute loyalty. This loyalty leads him to pay back a debt owed to a
close friend, despite warnings from his girlfriend, mother,
and a leader of the local church, himself a man with a past. The result
is an escalating pattern of violence between two gangs, with
the eventual loss of three young
lives.
Bullet Boy: sucked into crime
Ricky's 12 year old brother, Curtis,
is in turn fascinated and revolted by the revolver that Ricky brings
home, and he shows it to his friend, also 12. The two of them treat it
as merely an extension of a violent PlayStation game until Curtis
inadvertently shoots his friend, wounding him in the chest. The film
ends with a hopeful message when Curtis discards Ricky's revolver
in the
river.
Bullet Boy: power comes out of the barrel of a gun
Crime statistics demonstrate that
inner city black men between 15 and 29 are at greatest risk of
involvement in violent crime, either as perpetrator or victim. The
violence commonly occurs within known circles and near victims'
homes. This also leads to the over-representation of black males
in the criminal justice system and the prison
population.
Poor
economic conditions often force aggressor and victim to live in close
proximity. This phenomenon is termed "tinder box criminal
aggression." The film illustrates this point well, focusing on
some of the reasons for the development of the criminal subculture,
such as easy availability of firearms, violent role models,
and early exposure to violence in children's games. It also hints
at protective factors, such as the strength of the mother and the
influence of the church.
For
doctors, the film raises some uncomfortable questions. Does our
responsibility end only with the treatment of the victim? The cost of
treatment is borne by the taxpayer, but that in itself should impose
more responsibility on doctors to focus on prevention. Were the film
reality, a good start would have been a social services referral
regarding the injury suffered by the 12 year old. At the
least, this would offer support for families of both children,
and, at the most, trigger a referral to the local Multi-Agency
Public Protection Panel (MAPPP), consisting of
representatives from both health and criminal justice services.
However, with a general election looming and a greater
attempt by politicians to instil a culture of fear, doctors
might well shy away from questions with complicated
answers.
Star rating
**** Don't miss
* Don't bother
Piyal Sen, lead consultant, men's services, and consultant forensic psychiatrist, Priory/Blenheim Secure Services, Chadwick Lodge, Milton Keynes
studentBMJ 2005;13:177-220 May ISSN 0966-6494