Rural prescriptions
Idecided
to sign up for a rural elective in family medicine in my third year. I
imagined how grateful the citizens of the country would be if I decided
to practise there because I had completed my education in a large
teaching centre. It didn't take long before my illusions of being
a big city doctor came crashing down all around
me.
My mentor was a general
practitioner who held clinics every day from 9 to 5 and then hit the
mountain bike trails. Before clinic he went to the hospital to check
any of his patients who were in hospital. This was a small hospital,
with 60 beds, and all patients were admitted through the emergency
department. Once admitted, the patient's management in hospital
fell to his or her family doctor. I had to recall all my internal
medicine just to manage patients on a family medicine
rotation.
What impressed me most
about the doctors was their extensive knowledge. They knew how to
manage headaches, pigmented skin lesions, acute joint pain, depression,
and well baby visits all in one fully booked day, with several
drop-ins as well. What made them even more impressive was that
many of them had multiple jobs.
The
hospital rounds were included under the rubric of family medicine, but
a lot of the family doctors also did routine emergency shifts;
obstetrics, including caesarean sections; helping in the operating
theatre; and even anaesthesia. My mentor liked the variety. The
emergency shifts kept him sharp and up to date on the latest in
emergency management, while his occasional day helping in theatre
reminded him of being a medical student on a surgery
rotation.
There seemed to be a lot
of advantages to being a family physician in a rural area, but there
were also plenty of advantages for the patients. Unlike in the big
city, patients were never lost to follow-up after treatment in
the emergency department or as an inpatient. The family doctors took
responsibility for their care in hospital. Even when patients were
discharged from the emergency department without being admitted, a note
was left in the doctor's hospital mail box. There was no need to
wait for discharge letters that would be months overdue; the family
doctor was involved right from the start. The patients also benefited
from the other jobs in the repertoire of their family doctors. Lipomata
that would be left to a general surgeon in the big city were excised
carefully and quickly in the clinic by the patient's own doctor.
This resulted in less stress and anxiety for the patient and shorter
waiting times.
Before this
experience, I always assumed that bigger was better-the bigger
the hospital, the better the education and the better the care of
patients. But now I think we could all learn something from rural
family medicine. We might be better doctors with happier and healthier
patients.
David Holt, fourth year medical student, University of Toronto
Email: david.holt@utoronto.ca
studentBMJ 2006;14:441-484 December ISSN 0966-6494