What more proof do you need?
Some hospitals in the United
Kingdom have started testing their own candidates who apply for foundation
year posts. Neel Sharma investigates
Working towards a medical degree
is not easy, and it wasn't long after joining medical school that I
understood the phenomenal workload. The didactic "spoon feeding"
method with which we became intimate in our school days was a thing of the
past. In my clinical years there was an obvious decline in the number of
lectures, and with that the added benefit of specialist training sessions at
the bedside. They were interactive, of course: often so interactive as to put
individual students in the spotlight and have them questioned to the point of
humiliation.
In the United Kingdom, the clinical years also involve taking
student selected components, as part of which the student will compile a case
report or discussion of a particular disease in detail. At Manchester, where I
study, evaluations come in two forms-firstly, the ubiquitous multiple
choice questions, and secondly the objective structured clinical examination.
Our final exams also include a gruelling paper of extended matching questions
on themes such as symptoms, management, and diagnoses, intended to assess the
ability of the candidate to process and evaluate information. Other medical
schools also test their candidates using objective structured clinical
examinations, but the format of knowledge based papers may differ.
I'm not criticising these methods of assessment. It is
hard to imagine other ways to test our knowledge. Day to day quizzing in ward
rounds, course work reports, and end of year exams have become commonplace.
Some hospitals, however, think that these are not enough.
Recently, a competency assessment has been introduced to test students who
have applied for foundation posts. Yes: even qualified students, who satisfied
tough examiners to get their bachelor of medicine and surgery degree, must sit
the exam, which currently includes a 20 minute discussion of a hypothetical
acute medical scenario.
How can such tests be representative of candidates'
knowledge and skills. After all, objective structured clinical examinations,
with their multiple stations, were introduced to test students'
understanding of different clinical scenarios. These tests have been used by
medical schools for years since it was realised that there had been too much
emphasis on factual knowledge as opposed to clinical skills and attitudes.1
The right way forward?
Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) is responsible for the
current reform of postgraduate education (figure)2.
In the foundation programme, MMC is piloting four tests (multi source
feedback, mini clinical evaluation exercise, direct observation of procedural
skills, and case based discussion), which newly qualified doctors will have to
sit3. According to the organisation,
the purpose of these tests is to "help doctors be better doctors."
In addition, it states that "patients need to be assured that when a
doctor is registered he/she has demonstrated the ability to practise in
accordance with particular published standards."
The Modernising Medical Careers framework
I understand the importance of on the job training measures.
Firstly, practising medicine demands continual learning. Secondly, it is
important that astute clinicians can show their grasp of the clinical case in
question and the associated procedural scenarios. But to test candidates
before they start may serve, in my view at least, to dishearten them by
implying that their medical degrees are not important enough. I am appalled
and think it unjust for hospitals to set their own appraisals, particularly if
candidates have shown their worth throughout medical school, and the General
Medical Council has yet to implement this nationwide.
Neel Sharma, fifth year medical student
, Manchester University
Email: neel_sharma1@hotmail.com
studentBMJ 2007;15:89-132 March ISSN 0966-6494
- Dornan
T, O'Neill P. Core clinical skills for OSCEs in medicine. 3rd ed. London:
Churchill Livingstone, 2003.
- Modernising Medical
Careers. Career framework explained. London: MMC. www.mmc.nhs.uk/pages/specialities/specialityframework
(accessed 30 Sep 2006).
- Modernising Medical
Careers. Assessment. www.mmc.nhs.uk/pages/assessment
(accessed 30 Sep 2006).