Tackling depression
Rebecca Slack and Robert Chaplin argue that all doctors, not just psychiatrists, have a part to play
We’ve all heard the statistic that one in five of us will have depression at some time in our lives, but few of us will have
been moved to act upon it either for patients or ourselves. Depression has traditionally been considered to be the domain
of psychiatrists and primary care doctors, which has led to patients’ management tending to become confined to these areas.
But depression is seen in all specialties.
Left undiagnosed, depression can worsen the prognosis of almost all conditions. So to provide the best care for patients,
it is essential for all junior doctors to be equipped with the skills to recognise, assess, and treat depression.
Depression is an internationally recognised disease. That it is for the fourth greatest contributor to the global burden of
disease shows its cross cultural importance.w1 The World Health Organization predicts that by 2020 depression will have risen to first place, representing 154 million people
worldwide. The prevalence of depression in the community in the United Kingdom is 6.3%-17.1%.w2 Because each episode may last several months, the burden that depression renders upon society is great. This corresponds
to a yearly cost of £9bn (€12bn; $18bn)w3 in lost earnings; 110 million missed working days; and a cost to the National Health Service of £369m, of which only 11%
is spent on drugs.w4 In the United States the yearly cost is $83bn. Depression is important on an individual level in terms of disability and
misery, but it also has this wider economic impact on us all.
It is all too easy to compartmentalise medicine—newer modularised clinical courses tend to encourage this—each specialty forgotten
as we file away the rotation’s notes. However, evidence shows that patients presenting in all specialties have depression,
be it as the primary complaint or secondary diagnosis. Depression represents around 10% of all UK general practice consultations,
but only one third of these patients have their depression diagnosed and treated.w5 In medical wards, studies indicated that 30% of patients fit the criteria of the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders for mild depression, and about half this proportion is seen among surgical inpatients.w6 w7 Many medical and surgical outpatients may present with physical symptoms—for example, abdominal pain or weight loss—but many
of these may be the somatic symptoms of depression. We need to be on the lookout for symptoms of depression in all patients
that we see.
Medical implications
Why does it matter that the old woman in hospital after a myocardial infarction is depressed? The reason is that depression
is associated with many risks. The most serious is of suicide: an analysis of UK suicides showed that two thirds were directly
attributable to depression.w4 Most of these deaths were in elderly people, most of whom had considerable physical comorbidities. Of greater importance,
especially in young people and people with milder depression, is the association with deliberate self harm, which has become
more prevalent in recent years.
Most depressive illnesses will last about six months, but a proportion will become chronic, increasing the likelihood of the
patient having a poor quality of life and being unable to work. Depression produces disability that is quantitatively comparable
with that of other chronic conditions.w8 About 80% of appropriately treated patients will fully recover, usually within a few weeks.w9
Low mood heightens our sensitivity to physical distress and leaves us less able to cope with problems. Among patients at a
cardiac unit those with a comorbid depressive illness were twice as likely to have a further cardiac event, and they scored
significantly worse in assessments of long term quality of life.w10 w11 Similarly, surgical outpatients diagnosed with depressive illnesses tended to attend clinic more often and show the least
response to treatment.w12 To make life easier for yourself and your patient it is important to refresh your basic skills of diagnosing and treating
depression.
Diagnosing depression
The most crucial skill to have is the ability to recognise depression, and this means knowing how to screen for it. Although
depression may be obvious in an openly suicidal patient in the emergency room, it may be more subtle in presentation among
the physically unwell. The diagnosis of depression is clinical, and requires two “typical” symptoms plus at least two other
“core” symptoms (box 1). These should be present for a minimum of two weeks, cause considerable distress in social or occupational
functioning and not be secondary to the effects of substance misuse, drugs, or bereavement.w13 The number of symptoms roughly corresponds to the severity of the condition, so a depressive episode is described as being
mild, moderate, or severe, plus biological or psychotic symptoms. The latter occur in the most severely depressed patients,
who are referred to as having “psychotic depression.”w13 It should also be noted that depression can present with any somatic symptom.
Box 1: Symptoms of depressionw9 w13
Typical symptoms
- Depressed mood—every day, worse in the mornings
- Anhedonia (reduced pleasure in activities)
- Fatigue or loss of energy
Other core symptoms
- Weight loss or gain, change in appetite
- Disturbed sleep—insomnia, hypersomnia, early morning wakening
- Psychomotor retardation or agitation
- Reduced libido
- Feelings of worthlessness and guilt
- Poor concentration and indecision
- Thoughts of death or suicide
- Psychotic symptoms—hallucinations, delusions (often nihilistic and mood congruent in contrast to those of schizophrenia)
High risk groups should be routinely screened for depression, but it is also a worthwhile tool for general use (box 2). Effective
screening involves asking just two questions, making it quick and simple.w14 The specificity can be further increased by adding an optional third question,w15 and one positive reply should lead to asking directly about other core symptoms to confirm and quantify the diagnosis.
Box 2: High risk groupsw13
- History of depression
- Family history of depression
- Multiple physical illnesses
- Neurological conditions
- Chronic pain
- Another psychiatric diagnosis
- Traumatic childhood experiences
- Recent adverse life events
- Recent childbirth
- Frequent users of health services
(1) During the past month, have you often been bothered by feeling down, depressed, or hopeless?
(2) During the past month have you often been bothered by little interest or pleasure in doing things?
(3) Do you want help with these problems?
Personal experience has shown that in the general hospital setting, patients with severe depression are often misdiagnosed—an
example is the elderly patient admitted with no speech or movement assumed to have been failing to cope and subsequently left
untreated in a side room. Severe depression often results in slowed movements, poverty of speech, hallucinations or delusions,
and apathy. If these signs are recognised the patient should be urgently referred to the liaison psychiatry team.
Managing the patient
Once you have identified a patient with depression, you should act upon the diagnosis. This means doing a risk assessment
(box 3) and formulating a management plan. You should always ask directly about suicidal ideation and any previous suicide
attempts. Most people who complete suicides have a past history of deliberate self harm, and two thirds have seen a doctor
within four weeks of their death. Asking about these thoughts does not increase the risk of suicide.w8 Do not assume that because a patient is in hospital he or she is safe—take the same precautions for inpatients and outpatients.
Box 3: Basic risk assessmentw13
Risks to self
- Suicide or deliberate self harm
- Neglect of self care, nutrition, hydration
- Poor compliance with other drugs
- Social—loss of employment or relationships
Risk to others
- Safety of children (especially neglect)
- Fitness to drive
The first stage in treatment is to decide who should undertake the management of the patient. For most cases of mild depression,
it is safe for a junior doctor to treat the patient in the inpatient setting, with referral to the general practitioner after
discharge, but some patients should be referred to a psychiatrist (box 4). In the UK, management of depression follows a stepped
approach as recommended in the guidelines of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.w16 Mild and moderate depressive episodes are treated in the community by general practitioners; more severe or complex cases
are looked after by specialists.
Box 4: Who to refer to psychiatryw9 w13 w16
Urgent referral
- Severe depression
- High risk suicide or deliberate self harm
- Psychosis
- Risk to others
- Need for inpatient or day patient treatment or electroconvulsive treatment
Non-urgent referral
- Unclear diagnosis
- Bipolar disorder
- Comorbidities
- Failure to respond to treatment
- Intolerance to drugs
Mild cases
For patients with mild depression (and this will be most in other clinical settings) antidepressants are not recommended as
there is little proved benefit. A first approach is watchful waiting. Some patients will recover without treatment having
discussed the diagnosis, so review them in two weeks, or speak to their general practitioner to arrange this. Next comes advice
on sleep and anxiety management, a structured exercise programme (three 45 minute sessions of activity a week), and guided
self help materials. Guided self help consists of giving the patient information about depression and strategies for recovery
and then regularly assessing progress. A good starting point is the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ website (www.rcpsych.ac.uk) or voluntary organisations, such as MIND or the Samaritans.w17 w18 NICE also advocates the use of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy programmes where available.
Antidepressants
Antidepressant drugs are the mainstay of treatment for patients with moderate or severe depression. The preferred choice is
a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (for example, fluoxetine, citalopram, sertraline) because they are as effective as
tricyclic antidepressants and better tolerated by patients. Discuss the reasons behind starting drugs, and inform patients
that serotonin reuptake inhibitors are not addictive, of the risks of sudden withdrawal, and that they may experience side
effects that can precede the beneficial effects (for example, gastrointestinal upset, headaches, agitation, and insomnia).
Second line treatments include mirtazapine, venlafaxine, or tricyclic antidepressants.
Until recently it was thought that it took several weeks for antidepressants to take effect; it now seems that most patients
benefit within a few days.w19 All patients should be regularly reviewed, initially 2-4 weeks after starting treatment.w16 Three to four fifths of patients recover from their depression within weeks of starting an antidepressant.w20 It is worth noting that no one class of antidepressant has been proved to be more effective than another, but newer drugs
tend to have fewer side effects.w19 w21
Further options
The best psychological treatment for depression is cognitive behaviour therapy, and all patients with moderate to severe depression
who have not adequately responded to other treatments should be referred for a brief course (16-20 sessions) with a psychologist.
Patients with severe depression should be referred to a psychiatrist—either the liaison psychiatry team or a community psychiatrist.
A combination of antidepressants and cognitive behaviour therapy is the most likely form of management, but patients who pose
high risk may be treated by the crisis resolution team, as a day patient, or admitted for inpatient care. The biopsychosocial
model of care is now widely appreciated to be more efficacious than a single approach,w22 so a comprehensive package of care overseen by a dedicated care coordinator should be the ultimate aim.w21 Contrary to popular belief, electroconvulsive treatment is now the last treatment of choice, being reserved for patients
whose depression leads them to stop eating and drinking, to be at high risk of suicide, or to be in a depressive stupor. It
is an extremely effective treatment, but causes long term memory loss in some people.w19
All junior doctors everywhere will come across patients who have depression. Given that screening takes only seconds and that
effective treatment may benefit the patient’s psychological and physical health, there is no excuse for not being proactive.
Try to keep the differential of depression at the front of your mind and you could help reduce the burden it currently represents.
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed
In the BMJ: see the recent Clinical Review “Management of depression in adults” (BMJ 2008;336:435-9; doi: 10.1136/bmj.39478.609097.BE).
Rebecca Slack fifth year medical student 1Oxford University
Robert Chaplin consultant psychiatrist (general adult) 2Warneford Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 7JX
Email: rebecca.slack@merton.ox.ac.uk
Student BMJ 2008;: |
- WHO European Ministerial Conference. Mental Health: Facing the challenges, building solutions. WHO 2005;Ch1:pg1-2.
- Spigset O, Martensson B. Drug treatment of depression. BMJ 1999;318:1188-1191
- Gilbody S, Sheldon T, Wessely S. Should we screen for depression? BMJ 2006;332:1027-1029.
- Thomas C, Morris S. Cost of depression among adults in England in 2000. Br J Psych 2003;183:514-519.
- Mild depression in general practice: time for a rethink? Drug and therapeutics bulletin 2003;41:8.
- Rensch D, Dumont P, Borgacci S, Carballeira Y, De Tonnac N, Archinard M et al. Prevalence and treatment of depression in a hospital department of internal medicine. Gen Hosp Psych 2007;29(1):2-31.
- NiMhaolain A, Butler J, Magill P, Wood A, Sheehan J. The increased need for liaison psychiatry in surgical inpatients due to the high prevalence of undiagnosed anxiety and depression. Eur Psych 2007;22(S1):S163.
- Whooley M, Simon G. Managing depression in medical outpatients. N Eng J Med 2000;343(26):1942-1950.
- Gelder M, Harrison P, Cowen P. Shorter Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry. Oxford University Press 2006;5th Edition:Ch11.
- Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F. Depression and coronary artery disease. Hertz 2006;31:64-68.
- Stafford L, Berk M, Reddy P, Jackson H. Comorbid depression and health-related quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. J Psychosom Res 2007;62(4):401-410.
- Vaeroy H, Juell M, Hoivik B. Prevalence of depression among general hospital surgical inpatients. Nord J Psych 2003;57(1):13-16.
- Semple D, Smyth R, Burns J, Darjee R, McIntosh A. Oxford Handbook of Psychiatry. Oxford University Press 2005;Ch 7:pg 246.
- Arroll B, Khin N, Kerse N. Screening for depression in primary care with two verbally asked questions: cross sectional study. BMJ 2003;327:1144-1146.
- Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Kerse N, Fishman T, Gunn J. Effect of the addition of a “help” question to the two screening questions on specificity for diagnosis
- depression in general practice: diagnostic validity study. BMJ 2005;331:884.
- Depression: Management of depression in primary and secondary care. NICE 2004.
- www.rcpsych.ac.uk [Jan 2008].
- Parker G. Is depression overdiagnosed? BMJ 2007;335:328.
- Holtzheimer and Nemeroff. Advances in the treatment of depression. NeuroRx 2006; 3:42-56.
- Tylee A, Walters P. Onset of action of antidepressants. BMJ 2007;334:911-912.
- Bauer M, Bschor T, Pfennig A, Whyborw P, Angst J, Versiani M et al. WFSBP Task Force on Unipolar depressive disorders. World J Biol Psychiatry 2007;8:67-104.
- Williams JW, Gerrity M, Holsinger , Dobscha S, Gaynes B and Dietrich A. Systematic review of multifaceted interventions to improve depression care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2007;29:91-116.
|
EDUCATION
Tackling depression
(Rebecca Slack and Robert Chaplin, March 2008)
|
|
Christina Stamoulis (March 15th, 2008)
Year 5 Medicine, Manchester cstamoulis@doctors.org.uk
|
|
|
In addition to the points raised above, lack of adequate provision of counselling and cognitive behaviour therapy (in parts of the UK) have made doctors become hesitant when managing their depressed patients. I don't blame them. For many patients antidepressants combined with cognitive behavioural therapy is the most effective form of treatment. My GP tutor has the agonising task of explaining to his patients some of whom are in desperate need of care, that there will be a 9 month waiting list to see an NHS counsellor. This in itself can be a deterrant (for doctors of all levels) in diagnosing a patient with moderate depression. The media have labelled us as 'pill pushers' but how are we to strive away from this image without the resources to provide holistic care for our patients.
|
|
|
EDUCATION
Tackling depression
(Rebecca Slack and Robert Chaplin, March 2008)
|
|
Alice Howell (March 16th, 2008)
MSc in Culture and Health, Fourth Year Medical Student, University College London alice.r.howell@gmail.com
|
|
|
Depressive disorder exists, and can be a devastating condition which requires the attention of the medical establishment; however Slack and Chaplin's article in March's Student BMJ was symptomatic of a fallacy which exists within the psychiatric profession that has failed to understand normal human sadness. The system of diagnosis that they proposed, the current DSM classification system, fails to take account of any understanding of normal sadness and suffering and its critical differences with a depressive disorder. Are not the apparent 'universal symptoms of depression', as stated in the DSM IV more precisely Western ways of expressing suffering and distress which have been reduced to emotions that have been medicalised through a number of expert theories building and focusing on various aspects of our language-based folk model of depression?
I would argue that to simply provide 'all doctors' and medical students with lists of symptoms and then to state that effective remedies such as pharmacotherapy or cognitive behavioural therapy exist, is of little use to either the health care professional or the patient. Better systems need to be put in place in order to understand personal suffering and the frequent multiplicity of external causes of it. I would also argue that the prevalence of depression, on which the authors base their predications, is symptomatic of an overly broad description, leading to the misidentification of people's emotions and moods. Afterall, the answer to how many people have 'depression' is based on the way in which it is diagnosed. It is clear to me that the persistence of some of the symptoms listed by the authors tells us nothing since the markers are so arbitrary. Without a knowledge of the situational context in which the symptoms are grounded, which Slack and Chaplin ignore in their two question screening proposal, the natural reaction to a cancer-diagnosis, desertion of a spouse or loss of work will be misinterpretted as something pathological.
Alongside the reductional cl aims made, it is a widely held belief that 'depression is NOT an internationally recognised disease'. There is a large body of evidence, stemming from linguistics and anthropology, as well as psychiatry which demonstrates that since the assumption of a universality of emotion prototypes is incorrect, so must the assumption that emotions and emotional expression are universal categories. The notion of 'depression' has many unstable polythetic categorisations, whose inevitable multiple causalities are often diffuse and socially embedded. It is these intricacies that get overseen and ignored with the responses and management plans suggested by Slack and Chaplin in their reductionist approach to distress and suffering.
References:
Horwitz, A. (2007). The Loss of Sadness: How Pyschiatry Transformed Normal Sorrow Into Depressive Disorder. OUP.
Jadhav, S & Littlewood, R. (1994) Attitudes Towards Depression: Some Medical Antropological Queries. Pyschiatric Bulletin, 18 (9), 572-573
Kleinman A. & Good B. (eds) (1985) Culture and Depression: Studies in the Anthropology and Cross-Cultural Psychiatry of Affect and Disorder. Berkely: California University Press.
|
|
|
EDUCATION
Tackling depression
(Rebecca Slack and Robert Chaplin, March 2008)
|
|
J.Sunkersing (March 24th, 2008)
Second year medical student, University of Southampton sunkersing@aol.com
|
|
|
There is raised awareness in the health care setting about depression and the comprehensive NICE guidelines make treatment more structured. However, could the real issue be the less easily treated stigma associated with a mental illness? Many patients do not seek advice or treatment for fear of the stigma associated with both depression and mental illness in general.(1) People's ideas and opinions can be deeply rooted and thus difficult to change.
The government has set out a 5 year plan (2) to combat this stigmatism and negative stereotyping but how effective can this really be? Also as our population ages mental illnesses, including depression, will inevitably increase in incidence. Are we prepared to deal with this burden and the problems associated with stigma?
1.Barney L,Griffiths K,Jorm A,Christensen H. Stigma about depression and its impact on help-seeking intentions.
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (2006) 40 (1) , 51–54 doi:10.1111/j.1440-1614.2006.01741.x
2.Gould M. Government moves to end stigma of mental illness. BMJ 2004;328:1456 (19 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1456
|
|
|
EDUCATION
Tackling depression
(Rebecca Slack and Robert Chaplin, March 2008)
|
|
Paul Tanto (March 21st, 2008)
Medical Student, 3rd year, St George's, University of London ptanto@hotmail.com
|
|
|
Response to Christina Stamoulis
I agree with much of the correspondence regarding the lack of availability of talking therapies for the depressed. As long ago as 1995 it was recognised that the efficacy of talking measured that of medication (Antonuccio D, Danton W, and DeNelsky G, 1995).
General practitioners are able to offer psychological services direct from their surgeries through in-house conselling. These can have quick referral but clearly depend on the amount of counselling resource available. The skill set of the counsellor is at issue too. Many practices do, and perhaps more should be offered of these services usually brief intervention CBT.
This raises the question of whether CBT is the correct modality. Richard Layard clearly thinks so in his Depression Report from the LSE, which was duly adopted by the DH. The 9 months quoted may well refer to the shortage of clinical psychologists using CBT in post.
Perhaps the psychological therapies net needs to be cast wider? There are other modalities, and lots of counsellors who presumably could do with the work. The main difficulty that the other modalities are not mandated by NICE ie they're not CBT. But if there is a surplus of non-CBT therapists, should they not be used?
For patients who are struggling to get access to the appropriate therapy perhaps the issue could come back to all doctors by offering a double appointment? After all, it seems to be talking that's the solution.
Competing interest: I am married to a counsellor/trainee psychotherapist.
References
- Antonuccio, D. O., Danton, W. G., & DeNelsky, G. Y. (1995). Psychotherapy versus medication for depression: Challenging the conventional wisdom with data. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 574–585. Retrieved from World Wide Web: http://www.apa.org/journals/anton.html
- Layard R. (2006) The Depression Report. LSE: London. http://cep.lse.ac.uk/textonly/research/mentalhealth/DEPRESSION_REPORT_LAYARD.pdf accessed on 21 May 2008 at 16:00
- Department of Health. (2008). Improving Access to Psychological Therapies.
|
|
|