Guidelines stress
the need for compliance with prophylaxis and standby medication, says
Jane N Zuckerman
The advisory committee on malaria prevention for UK travellers has updated the guidance for healthcare professionals who advise
travellers.1 Noteworthy changes have been made in the advice from the guidelines
produced previously. The new guidance places greater emphasis on the use of certain malaria chemoprophylaxis and has important changes regarding emergency standby medication.
Worldwide, over 40% of the population live in malarious areas with an estimated
300-500 million cases of malaria occurring each year resulting in up to two million
deaths.2 Importantly malaria is one of the most common causes of serious illness
in the returning traveller. At least 2000 cases (10 000 in Europe3) are imported into the United Kingdom each year, and nine of these on average result in death. The proportion of cases due to Plasmodium falciparum has continued to rise, accounting for more than half of
the cases.1 4
Low price travel has led to increasing numbers of travellers visiting areas where malaria is endemic. Few of these travellers seek travel health advice before departure; the results of a study of European travellers showed that only 40% sought advice.5 Initiatives to raise awareness and encourage more travellers to seek medical advice need to be developed as a priority, following the example of the Know before you go campaign of the Foreign and commonwealth Office and the malaria awareness week.4 Last minute travel reduces the likelihood of travellers seeking advice. This affects malaria chemoprophylaxis, which needs to be started before departure. Although doxycycline and atovaquone-proguanil can be started one day before travel, mefloquine needs to be started two and a half weeks before departure.1
Travel medicine is a rapidly expanding complex discipline, and the need for experienced specialists is acknowledged in the strategy of the Department of Health for combating infectious
diseases.7 8 With a continually changing picture, in terms of both the increase in drug resistant malaria and the development of malaria chemoprophylaxis, travel health practitioners need to have access to regular updates of
guidance now available on the internet (www.hpa.org.uk). Guidelines are
a crucial way of standardising and maintaining best clinical practice
in travel health advice and ensuring that it is evidence
based.
The guidelines from the World
Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and
the updated guidelines from the advisory committee on malaria
prevention recommend chemoprophylaxis of malaria by area, identifying
those areas where chloroquine resistant malaria is present and
differentiating between areas of high and low risk. The updated
guidelines from the advisory committee on malaria prevention reflect
the expanding choice of malaria chemoprophylaxis. In line with the WHO
and CDC guidelines, mefloquine, doxycycline, and
atovaquone-proguanil are the three recommended options for
prophylaxis in areas with chloroquine resistant malaria, which is
becoming increasingly
prevalent.3
9 The
guidelines all recommend that standby emergency medication is provided
for travellers taking prophylaxis who are travelling to remote areas
and where they will be unable to access medical help within 24 hours.
Travellers provided with standby emergency medication need to be
sufficiently informed to be able to make reasonable judgments about
taking the
medication.1
As well, all guidance recommends restrictive criteria for the provision
of standby emergency medication and for travellers to be given clear
written instructions for its use. Studies from outside the United
Kingdom have shown that standby treatment is often used incorrectly,
since less than 17% of travellers subsequently have a
confirmatory diagnosis of
malaria.1
In addition to people travelling to remote areas, standby medication may
also be considered for people making short visits or living in an area
with a low risk of drug resistant malaria. The guidelines from the
advisory committee on malaria prevention say that
while chloroquine can be used in
non-resistant areas, atovaquone-proguanil or
co-artemether are recommended for areas where resistance has
developed. Quinine alone is recommended now only for pregnant women,
for whom no satisfactory alternatives
exist.
Compliance can be a problem
with malaria chemoprophylaxis, and the need for regular administration
must be emphasised; most deaths occur in people who take prophylaxis
irregularly or not at
all.1 We
need to communicate the importance of continuing prophylaxis after
return, between one and four weeks depending on the medication,
together with seeking medical advice if any symptoms of ill health
occur several months after
return.
Uptake of malaria
prophylaxis has not been helped by the emphasis placed on the side
effect profile of mefloquine. A recent study showed high tolerability
to the four currently recommended drug regimenscombined
chloroquine and proguanil, mefloquine, doxycycline, and combined
atovaquone and proguanilwith no reported serious adverse
events.10
The latter two regimens were the better tolerated of the four. Although
mefloquine is a valuable option, travel medicine professionals must be
knowledgeable about its potential contraindications and serious side
effects.
Analysis of travel trends shows that foreign travel
will continue to increase; travel outside Europe and North America is
currently rising at a rate of 7% each
year.11
UK travellers' continuing nonchalance regarding foreign travel
means that practitioners of travel medicine need to emphasise the real
risk of malaria infection to guard against the increasing and largely
preventable mortality of the disease in
travellers.4
The availability of up to date guidance from the advisory committee on
malaria prevention, WHO, and CDC provide the best tools with which this
can be
achieved.
Jane N Zuckerman, director,
WHO Collaborating Centre in Travel Medicine, Academic Centre for Travel
Medicine and Vaccines, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London NW3 2PF
Email: j.zuckerman@rfc.ucl.ac.uk
Competing
interests: JNZ has been reimbursed by several manufacturers of vaccines
and antimalarial prophylaxis for attending conferences and running
educational programmes and has received unrestricted educational
grants. She is also a consultant in travel medicine to the British
Airways travel
clinics.
studentBMJ 2004;12:309-348 September ISSN 0966-6494
References:
- Bradley DJ, Bannister B, on behalf of the Health Protection Agency advisory committee on malaria prevention for UK travellers. Guidelines for malaria prevention in travellers from the United Kingdom for 2003. Commun Dis Public Health 2003;6:180-99.
- Breman JG. The ears of the hippopotamus: manifestations, determinations, and estimates of the malaria burden. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001;64(suppl1-2):1-11.
- World Health Organization. International travel and health: vaccination requirements and health advice. Geneva: WHO, 2004. www.who.int/ith/ (accessed 16 Jun 2004).
- Malaria Awareness Initiative. Malaria awareness week. www.malariahotspots.co.uk (accessed 1 Jun 2004).
- Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Travel advice service: know before you go. www.fco.gov.uk/knowbeforeyougo (accessed 1 Jun 2004).
- Van Herck K, Zuckerman J, Castelli F, Van Damme P, Walker E, Steffen R, for the European Travel Health Advisory Board. Travelers’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices on prevention of infectious diseases: results from a pilot study. J Travel Med 2003;10:75-8.
- Zuckerman JN. Reflections and reactions: Shaping travel health and medicine for the future. Lancet Infect Dis 2001;1:296-7.
- Department of Health. Getting ahead of the curve: a strategy for combating infectious diseases in the United Kingdom. London: Department of Health, 2002.
- National Center for Infectious Diseases Travelers’ Health. The yellow book: health information for international travel 2003-2004. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control.www.cdc.gov/travel/yb/toc.htm (accessed 1 June 1004).
- Schlagenhauf P, Tschopp A, Johnson R, Nothdurft HD, Beck B, Schwartz E, et al. Tolerability of malaria chemoprophylaxis in non-immune travellers to sub-Saharan Africa: multicentre, randomised, double blind, four arm study. BMJ 2003;327:1078.
- Office for National Statistics. Travel trends: a report on the 2001 international passenger survey. London: Stationery Office, 2002